philpan1c

PhilSPEN Online Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

(Article 27 | POJ_0021.html) Issue January 2012 - June 2016: 111-120

Original Clinical Investigation

Prevalence of sarcopenia in the Philippines: report from a hospital based weight management center

Abstract | Introduction | Methodology | Results | Discussion | Conclusion | References | PDF (178 KB) |Back to Articles Page

Submitted: April 30, 2016| Posted: June 20, 2016

AUTHORS:

Maricar Esculto MD (1), Kevin Carpio RND (3), Maria Nenita Umali RND (2), Iree Velasco RND(1,2), Eduardo Oliveros MD (2), Leonora Panlasigui PhD (3) and Luisito Llido MD (1,2,3)

INSTITUTION WHERE RESEARCH WAS CONDUCTED:

  1. Clinical Nutrition Service, St. Luke’s Medical Center, E. Rodriguez Avenue, Quezon City, Philippines, 1102
  2. Weight Management and Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Center, St. Luke’s Medical Center,E. Rodriguez Avenue, Quezon City, Philippines 1102
  3. School of Nutrition, Philippine Women’s University, 743 Taft Avenue, Manila, Philippines

ABSTRACT: | Back

Background: Sarcopenia is associated with poor outcomes hence its diagnosis is important because of its impact on morbidity and mortality. Prevalence studies have been published in the U.S. and the Asia Pacific region but there is no data on sarcopenia in the Philippines

Objective:

a) To determine the body composition reference data (skeletal muscle mass and index) from a normal Filipino population composed of students from a university in Manila, Philippines, the Philippines Women’s University and deriving the sarcopenia cut-off values from this data.
b) To determine the prevalence of sarcopenia among patients seen in the Weight Management Center of St. Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines using the data from the local reference population.

Methodology: Demographic, anthropometric and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) data of one thousand six hundred five subjects seen in the Weight Management and Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Center of St. Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines from 2003 to 2010 were analyzed for this study. From these data, the Skeletal Muscle Mass (SM in kg) and Index (SMI) was determined and based from the cut-off values from a normal healthy control population (N=115, students aged 18 to 25 years old, male and female, with a BMI range from 18.5 to 25) the diagnosis of sarcopenia is made. Sarcopenia 1 means the SMI falls one standard deviation below the mean SMI values of each gender from the normal population; it is Sarcopenia 2 if it is two standard deviations below the normal mean.

Results: The cut-off values are as follows: between 8.54 and 7.93 for males and between 6.3 and 5.87 for females to diagnose Sarcopenia Type 1 and below 7.93 for males and below 5.87 for females for Sarcopenia Type 2. Only 0.3% (5/1,605) of the total population was found to have Sarcopenia Type 1. Three out of 144 elderly (2.1%) has Type 1 Sarcopenia. Sarcopenia Type 1 was not seen among the obese. Sarcopenia Type 2 was not seen in this population. In reference to the nutritional status, three of the underweight subjects (3/25 or 12%) and two who have normal BMI (2/191 or 1.05%) were diagnosed to have Type 1 Sarcopenia. No diagnosis of sarcopenia was made among the overweight and obese subjects. Over-all sarcopenia for males was 1/572 or 0.17% while for females it was 4/1,033 or 0.4%; overall sarcopenia rate was 5/1,605 or 0.3%. Among the elderly it was 3/144 or 2.08%. 

Conclusion: The study was able to determine the cut-off values to diagnose sarcopenia from the body composition reference data of a normal Filipino population. It was found that there is a lower prevalence of sarcopenia among the Filipino subjects compared to their other Asian counterparts.

 

KEYWORDS: sarcopenia, obesity, BMI, body composition

 

INTRODUCTION | Back

Sarcopenia is a syndrome characterised by progressive and generalised loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength. This condition is associated with a risk of adverse outcomes such as physical disability, poor quality of life and death due to the underlying diminished lean body mass, commonly present in the elderly. (1) In critical care patients with mechanical ventilator support, sarcopenic patients had lesser ventilator free days, shorter ICU free days and higher mortality (2x) compared to non-sarcopenic patients. (2) In colorectal surgery cancer patients, those with sarcopenia had more cardiac arrhythmias, hypertension, COPD, diabetes and fluid and electrolyte disorders. (3) Finally in emergency surgery elderly patients, it was noted that those without sarcopenia had lower mortality rates thus making the presence or absence of sarcopenia a predictive factor on outcome(s). (4) It is therefore important to identify the presence of sarcopenia in order to have a good predictive capability in terms of critical care, post-surgical management including the care of the elderly patient population.  The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) has designed an algorithm on how to identify the presence of sarcopenia in order to make prognostic decisions and making the necessary building up or maintenance to improve outcomes (Figure 1). (1)

sarc_fig01

Figure 1: Algorithm for the diagnosis of sarcopenia (1)

The table below shows the suggested examinations to determine and/or evaluate skeletal muscle mass and function (Table 1)

sarctbl01

The examinations in the research setting are more rigid and extensive, but the examinations recommended for use in clinical practice are more practical and affordable. Among these are anthropometry, BIA, handgrip strength, and the gait speeds. Body composition analysis is used more frequently nowadays thus the need for easier to perform examinations using equipment which are less expensive and portable. The BIA machine was evaluated and found to have good results when validated from the studies done by Heymsfield, Baumgartner (5) and Janssen (6). The formulas at arriving at the skeletal muscle mass based the BIA (bioelectrical impedance analysis) were derived by Janssen and the resulting formulation of the skeletal muscle index (SMI) has helped in the determination of sarcopenia in the population specifically the elderly and malnourished. Reports on the prevalence of sarcopenia in the U.S. have been published (13%-24%) (5) and reports from the Asia Pacific region are also available (Table 2). (7-14)

sarctbl02

There is no data on sarcopenia in the Philippines and with the rising prevalence of obesity in Asia it was deemed important to know if sarcopenia is present in this group of patients in the country. BIA is relatively common in the wellness units in the hospitals, thus there is a wealth of data available to analyze the cut-off values of sarcopenia and thus to come up with the local prevalence of sarcopenia in the elderly and the obese population. The objectives of this study are: a) To determine the body composition reference data (skeletal muscle mass and index, fat mass, fat free mass and total body water) from a normal population composed of students from a university in Manila, the Philippines Women’s University, and b) To determine the prevalence of sarcopenia among patients seen in the Weight Management Center of St. Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City using the BIA data from the patients and local reference population.

 

METHODOLOGY | Back

The health care unit where the study was done was the Weight Management and Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Center of St. Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines. The center’s main aim is to manage the body composition of obese and underweight patients through a multidisciplinary approach. It is run by a team composed of physicians, dietitians, nurses and physical therapists. It also offers wellness packages and health maintenance care. Records of all patients seen at the center from 2003 to 2010 were reviewed. The data gathered from the patients from this study are: height in meters, weight in kilograms, BMI, and Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) data. These are encoded into a data base using Microsoft Access version 2013. Body composition was measured using a BIA machine (Tanita brand) which measures the fat free mass, fat mass, impedance value and total body water. It does the measurements with the patients standing up.

Sarcopenia is determined by getting the skeletal muscle mass of the patients using the Janssen equation for skeletal muscle mass. (6) This is the formula for skeletal muscle mass or SM:

SM mass (kg) = [(Ht2/R) x 0.401) + (gender x 3.825) + (age x - 0.071)] + 5.102 where Ht is height in centimeters; R is BIA resistance in ohms; for gender, men = 1 and women = 0; and age is in years.

Once this is obtained the Skeletal Muscle Index or SMI of the patient is determined and Sarcopenia Type 1 or Type 2 is diagnosed if the patient’s SMI falls below the Sarcopenia Type 1 or Sarcopenia Type 2 cut-off values. This is the formula for the SMI:

Skeletal Muscle Index (SM) = Skeletal Muscle Mass (SM) in kg divided by the square of the Height in meters or SMI = SM/Ht2

The cut-off values are taken from SMI measurements from a normal healthy control population which in this case are students aged 18 to 25 years old, male and female, with a BMI range from 18.5 to 25 enrolled in the Philippine Women’s University (PWU). (To be published) The standard deviations from the mean SMI of the male and female control populations are determined and the sarcopenia cut-off values are shown in the table below (Table 3):

sarv tbl03

We arbitrarily assigned a one half (1/2) of the standard deviation cut-off to determine if it will be sensitive enough to show more sarcopenic patients in as much as the suggested cut-off values by Janssen (16) and used by Malaysia group (11) showed more sarcopenia patients. (Table 2) The main issue with the Filipino data was that the mean SMI of the reference Filipino population was lower than the Janssen cut-off values (9.16 kg/m2 vs. 10.75 kg/m2 for males) or equal (6.74 kg/m2 vs. 6.75 kg/m2 for females). Utilizing the ½ and 1 standard deviation cut-off is done to find out if there is a significant difference in the resulting numbers.

 

RESULTS | Back

One thousand six hundred five subjects were included in the study (572 males, 1,033 females). Among the population, 59.4% are obese (n=953; 412 males, 541 females). Those aged 60 years and above comprise 144 and they are classified as the elderly population (58 males, 86 females). One hundred one (101) of the subjects are found to be both elderly and obese (43 males, 58 females). Sarcopenia was identified in 5 of the subjects and among them, 3 belong to the elderly. No obese subject was found to have sarcopenia. Shown in the following tables are the data on sarcopenia from the Weight Management Center:

sarctbl04

sarctbl05

As shown in Tables 4 and 5 there was an increase in the number of sarcopenia patients when the cut-off was reduced to ½ of the standard deviation of the normal Filipino control data indicating that although minimal this change may be more reflective of sarcopenia in this population. The suggested cut-offs by Janssen et al are not appropriate for this Filipino population group.


sarctbl06

The prevalence of sarcopenia was also computed based on the nutritional status. Twenty five out of 1,605 subjects (1.6%) were underweight and three of them were diagnosed to have Type 1 Sarcopenia. One hundred ninety one of the subjects (11.9%) had normal BMI and two of them have Type 1 Sarcopenia. No diagnosis of Sarcopenia was found among the overweight and obese subjects. These are the data on sarcopenia in the different nutritional status groups (BMI based).

sarctbl07

 

DISCUSSION: | Back

BIA measurement is an integral part of the assessment of patients referred to the weight management center where the current study is done. Various definitions for sarcopenia are available and some require additional evaluation for muscle strength and physical performance which, unfortunately are not routinely done in the evaluation of patients in some centers. (1, 15) In this retrospective study where only the skeletal muscle mass may be derived from the available data, the method of Janssen was used for the diagnosis of Sarcopenia.

In the literature, cut off for Sarcopenia among elderly Hispanic and white men and women are 7.26 kg-m-2 and 5.45 kg-m-2 respectively. (5) In another study among non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican American, the cut-offs are at <8.50 kg/m2 for men and <5.75 kg/m2 for women for severe sarcopenia. Various cut-off points were also computed in studies done in other Asian countries (7,8,9,11,13) and these are summarized in Table 2. The prevalence of sarcopenia among the Asian population ranges from 6.3% to 89% in men and 4.1% to 40.3% in women (Table 2) (7-14)
           
Our results showed that the cut-off values for sarcopenia were <8.54 kg/m2 in men and <6.3 kg/m2 in women. The female and male cut-off falls within the range of the cut-offs from the other Asian countries. In terms of prevalence, only 0.3% of the total population was diagnosed to have sarcopenia type 1 and there was no diagnosis of sarcopenia type 2. Sixty percent (3/5) of the identified sarcopenic in the population belongs to the elderly age group (more than 60 years). This is consistent with the observation of Baumgartner and Janssen that the prevalence of sarcopenia increases with age but considering the total prevalence among the elderly subjects in this study, the results are relatively low (1.7% in elderly male, 2.3% in elderly female, 2.1% of the overall elderly subjects) compared to previous studies where it was noted that prevalence increased from 13% to 24% in persons under 70 years of age to >50% in persons over 80 years of age (5) and 45% and 59% respectively for men and women aged 60 years and above (class I sarcopenia). (16)
           
No diagnosis of sarcopenia was seen among the obese population. This might be reflective of the findings in the study of Baumgartner wherein there was a significant protective association for obesity in both men and women (Odds Ratio: 0.11 and 0.07 respectively. (5)
           
None of the previous studies reviewed related sarcopenia with nutritional status. In this study, we also determined the prevalence of sarcopenia based on the nutritional status (BMI based – WHO criteria) and it was found that most of the subjects who were diagnosed to have sarcopenia belong to the underweight group (12% of total underweight subjects). The most plausible explanation for this is that loss of muscle mass results to a decreased weight and lower BMI. However, inference based from this finding is difficult to arrive at because other factors which may contribute to weight changes such as exercise, adequacy of intake and presence of co-morbid conditions were not accounted.

The present study has several limitations. First, the equation that was used for predicting the skeletal muscle mass of the subjects for this study, although used in other studies done in Asia (7,11), was derived from Caucasians and was stated to have the tendency to under predict the skeletal muscle mass of the Asian cohort (6) hence if this is the case, a lower computed skeletal muscle mass and a possible higher prevalence of sarcopenia is expected to be observed. As of this writing, no other predictive equations to compute for the skeletal muscle mass using BIA data which is validated for the Asian population is available. Second, selection bias is a major limitation in this study due to the fact that majority of the subjects are overweight and obese patients who are referred to the center for weight management. This finding may, however, emphasize that sarcopenic obesity may be seen only in patients who are elderly and with chronic disease like cancer or chronic infections, not the patients in the wellness programs who have otherwise normal status and function. Lastly, factors that may affect body composition such as presence of co-morbidities, physical activity, diet and intake of certain medications are not known.

CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION: | Back

The study was able to determine the cut-off values to diagnose sarcopenia from the body composition reference data of a normal Filipino population. It was found that there is a lower prevalence of sarcopenia among the Filipino subjects compared to their other Asian counterparts. Computations of skeletal muscle index and comparing it to the reference values to be able to diagnose sarcopenia in institutions where BIA machines are readily available and accessible can readily be made and appropriate interventions can immediately be included in patient management. There is still a need for more data to get more sensitive results. Creation of our own validation studies for the Asian population is an area of great interest.

 

REFERENCES: | Back

  1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age and Ageing 2010; 39: 412–423.
  2. Moisey LL, Mourtzakis M, Cotton BA, Premji T, Heyland DK, Wade CE, Bulger E, Kozar RA. Skeletal muscle predicts ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and mortality in elderly ICU patients. Crit Care 2013; 17(5): R206. doi: 10.1186/cc12901.
  3. Lieffers JR, Bathe OF, Fassbender K, Winget M and Baracos VE. Sarcopenia is associated with postoperative infection and delayed recovery from colorectal cancer resection surgery. British Journal of Cancer 2012; 107: 931–936. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.350.
  4. Du Y, Karvellas C, Baracos V, Williams DC, and Khadaroo RG. Sarcopenia is a predictor of outcomes in very elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. Surgery, 2014; 156(3:521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.027
  5. Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, Romero L, Heymstleld SB, Ross RR, Garry PJ, and Lindem RD. Epidemiology of Sarcopenia among the Elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147(8): 755-63.
  6. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN and Ross R. Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis. .J Appl Physiol, 2000; 89:465-471
  7. Chien MY, Huang TY, Wu YT. Prevalence of sarcopenia estimated by a bioelectrical impedance analysis prediction equation in community-dwelling elderly people in Taiwan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56: 1710–1715.
  8. Kim et. al. Prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in Korean adults: the Korean sarcopenic obesity study. International Journal of Obesity, 2009; 33: 885–892; doi:10.1038/ijo.2009.130; published online 30 June 2009
  9. Sanada K, Miyachi M, Tanimoto M, Yamamoto K, Murakami H, Okumura S, Gando Y, Suzuki K, Tabat I, Higuchi M. A cross-sectional study of sarcopenia in Japanese men and women: reference values and association with cardiovascular risk factors. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2010; 110(1): 57-65.doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1473-z
  10. Tanimoto Y, Watanabe M, Sun W et al. Association between sarcopenia and higher-level functional capacity in daily living in community-dwelling elderly subjects in Japan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2012; 55: e9–13.
  11. Norshafarina et. al. Sarcopenia and Its Impact on Health: Do They Have Significant Associations? Sains Malaysiana, 2013; 42(9): 1345–1355
  12. Lee WJ, Liu LK, Peng LN, Lin MH, Chen LK. Comparisons of sarcopenia defined by IWGS and EWGSOP criteria among older people: results from the I-Lan longitudinal aging study. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2013; 14: 528.e1-7.
  13. Meng P, Hu YX, Fan L, Zhang Y, Zhang MX, Sun J, Liu Y, Li M, Yang Y, Wang LH, Zhang Y, Gao W, Han XQ, Chen LK. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity among men aged 80 years and older in Beijing: prevalence and its association with functional performance. Geriatr Gerontol Int ,2014; 14 Suppl 1:29-35.
  14. Cruz-Jentof, et. Al. Prevalence of and interventions for sarcopenia in ageing adults: a systematic review. Report of the International Sarcopenia Initiative (EWGSOP and IWGS). Age and Ageing, 2014; 43: 748–759
  15. International Working Group on Sarcopenia. Sarcopenia: An Undiagnosed Condition in Older Adults. Current Consensus Definition: Prevalence, Etiology, and Consequences. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2011; 12(4): 249–256. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.003
  16. Janssen I, Heymsfield S, Ross R. Low Relative Skeletal Muscle Mass (Sarcopenia) in Older Persons Is Associated with Functional Impairment and Physical Disability. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 2002; Vol 50, No.5. p 889-896.
     

Abstract | Introduction | Methodology | Results | Discussion | References | Back to Articles Page